<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Out of the Box &#187; abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/tag/abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box</link>
	<description>Notes from the Archives at The Library of Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lee Co. Chancery Goes Digital!</title>
		<link>http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/2012/11/02/lee-co-chancery-goes-digital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/2012/11/02/lee-co-chancery-goes-digital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chancery Court Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chancery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chancery Causes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chancery Records Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit Court Records Preservation Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/?p=5917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/lee_1882_052_0045.jpg" title="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." rel="lightbox[singlepic1621]" ><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-left" src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/cache/1621__320x240_lee_1882_052_0045.jpg" alt="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." title="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." /></a>
<p>The Library of Virginia is pleased to announce that digital images for <a href="http://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaxtf/view?docId=lva/vi03752.xml">Lee County Chancery Causes</a>, 1857-1912, are now available on the <a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/">Chancery Records Index.</a> Because they rely so heavily on the testimony of witnesses, chancery causes contain a wealth of historical and genealogical information and are especially useful when researching local, state, social, and legal history. The Lee County chancery collection offers a glimpse of life in Lee County during the 19<sup>th</sup> and early-20<sup>th</sup> centuries by documenting the African American experience, women’s history, Southern business and labor history, and the impact the railroad’s arrival had on a region. Following are a few suits of interest found in the collection.</p>
<p>Lee County chancery causes contain several suits illustrating the experiences of women in the westernmost part of the commonwealth. In <em>Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons, etc.</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1887-019">1887-019</a>, Mary Pennington sought to gain control over land gifted to her by her father. The land was being sold by her husband, William Pennington, who had become “indebted and greatly embarrassed.” In 1907, Elizabeth Smith faced a similar dilemma. <em>Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg, etc.</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1907-045">1907-045</a>, protested the sale of Smith’s land sold for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth Smith did not agree to the sale, but her husband, Samuel L. Smith, “commenced &#8230; <a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/2012/11/02/lee-co-chancery-goes-digital/" class="read_more">read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/lee_1882_052_0045.jpg" title="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." rel="lightbox[singlepic1621]" ><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-left" src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/cache/1621__320x240_lee_1882_052_0045.jpg" alt="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." title="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." /></a>
<p>The Library of Virginia is pleased to announce that digital images for <a href="http://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaxtf/view?docId=lva/vi03752.xml">Lee County Chancery Causes</a>, 1857-1912, are now available on the <a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/">Chancery Records Index.</a> Because they rely so heavily on the testimony of witnesses, chancery causes contain a wealth of historical and genealogical information and are especially useful when researching local, state, social, and legal history. The Lee County chancery collection offers a glimpse of life in Lee County during the 19<sup>th</sup> and early-20<sup>th</sup> centuries by documenting the African American experience, women’s history, Southern business and labor history, and the impact the railroad’s arrival had on a region. Following are a few suits of interest found in the collection.</p>
<p>Lee County chancery causes contain several suits illustrating the experiences of women in the westernmost part of the commonwealth. In <em>Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons, etc.</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1887-019">1887-019</a>, Mary Pennington sought to gain control over land gifted to her by her father. The land was being sold by her husband, William Pennington, who had become “indebted and greatly embarrassed.” In 1907, Elizabeth Smith faced a similar dilemma. <em>Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg, etc.</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1907-045">1907-045</a>, protested the sale of Smith’s land sold for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth Smith did not agree to the sale, but her husband, Samuel L. Smith, “commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed,” forcing her to agree to the sale. Both suits were dismissed by the court.</p>
<p>The arrival of the Louisville &amp; Nashville Railroad had significant impact on the region with suits filed by and against the company appearing several times in the chancery collection. In <em>Louisville</em><em> &amp; Nashville Railroad Co. vs. Nimrod Noe</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1891-012">1891-012</a>, the railroad attempted to halt payments Nimrod Noe received in a condemnation proceeding by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the arrival of the railroad. In the <em>Petition of A. L. Loyd, Administrator</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1902-003">1902-003</a>, a settlement is sought for B. H. Loyd’s family after his death in a railroad accident. B. H. Loyd, an engineer with the Louisville &amp; Nashville Railroad, was killed after losing control of his locomotive and colliding with another train on a foggy night.</p>

<div class="ngg-galleryoverview" id="ngg-gallery-205-5917">


	
	<!-- Thumbnails -->
		
	<div id="ngg-image-1616" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/105_1894_079_0080p.jpg" title="Plat of the Cranks-Jonesville Road, Lee County Chancery Cause Benjamin F. Sneed, etc. vs. Jeff Pennington, etc., 1894-079." rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="Plat of the Cranks-Jonesville Road, Lee County Chancery Cause Benjamin F. Sneed, etc. vs. Jeff Pennington, etc., 1894-079." alt="Plat of the Cranks-Jonesville Road, Lee County Chancery Cause Benjamin F. Sneed, etc. vs. Jeff Pennington, etc., 1894-079." src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_105_1894_079_0080p.jpg" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 		
	<div id="ngg-image-1617" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/105_1894_079_0085p.jpg" title="Plat of Sugar Run Road, Lee Count Chancery Cause 1894-079, Benjamin F. Sneed, etc. vs. Jeff Pennington, etc." rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="Plat of Sugar Run Road, Lee Count Chancery Cause 1894-079, Benjamin F. Sneed, etc. vs. Jeff Pennington, etc." alt="Plat of Sugar Run Road, Lee Count Chancery Cause 1894-079, Benjamin F. Sneed, etc. vs. Jeff Pennington, etc." src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_105_1894_079_0085p.jpg" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 		
	<div id="ngg-image-1618" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/105_1894_082_0006.jpg" title="Letter, 11 August 1893, from Richard M. Turner to his wife, Lilly C. Turner, describing the women he was having affairs with, Lee County Chancery Cause Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner, 1894-082." rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="Letter, 11 August 1893, from Richard M. Turner to his wife, Lilly C. Turner, describing the women he was having affairs with, Lee County Chancery Cause Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner, 1894-082." alt="Letter, 11 August 1893, from Richard M. Turner to his wife, Lilly C. Turner, describing the women he was having affairs with, Lee County Chancery Cause Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner, 1894-082." src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_105_1894_082_0006.jpg" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 		
	<div id="ngg-image-1619" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/105_1894_082_0007.jpg" title="Turner letter page 2, Lee County Chancery Cause 1894-082, Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner." rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="Turner letter page 2, Lee County Chancery Cause 1894-082, Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner." alt="Turner letter page 2, Lee County Chancery Cause 1894-082, Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner." src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_105_1894_082_0007.jpg" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 		
	<div id="ngg-image-1620" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/105_1904_057_0132p.jpg" title="Plat including a picture of lumber machinery, H. C. T. Richmond vs. S. Bailey &amp; Co., Lee County Chancery Cause 1904-057." rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="Plat including a picture of lumber machinery, H. C. T. Richmond vs. S. Bailey &amp; Co., Lee County Chancery Cause 1904-057." alt="Plat including a picture of lumber machinery, H. C. T. Richmond vs. S. Bailey &amp; Co., Lee County Chancery Cause 1904-057." src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_105_1904_057_0132p.jpg" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 		
	<div id="ngg-image-1621" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/lee_1882_052_0045.jpg" title="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." alt="First issue of Emory and Henry College's the Emory and Henry Casket, John Slack vs. John W. Carnes, etc., Lee County Chancery Cause 1882-052." src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_lee_1882_052_0045.jpg" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 		
	<div id="ngg-image-1622" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/lee_1897_006_0004.jpg" title="Bill of F. E. Parsons detailing the allegations of abortion made by her late husband's heirs, Lee County Chancery Cause F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee, etc., 1897-006." rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="Bill of F. E. Parsons detailing the allegations of abortion made by her late husband's heirs, Lee County Chancery Cause F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee, etc., 1897-006." alt="Bill of F. E. Parsons detailing the allegations of abortion made by her late husband's heirs, Lee County Chancery Cause F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee, etc., 1897-006." src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_lee_1897_006_0004.jpg" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 		
	<div id="ngg-image-1623" class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box"  >
		<div class="ngg-gallery-thumbnail" >
			<a href="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/map_showing_lee_county_virginia.png" title="Map showing the location of Lee County, Virginia. (Image public domain/Wikipedia)" rel="lightbox[set_205]" ><img title="Map showing the location of Lee County, Virginia. (Image public domain/Wikipedia)" alt="Map showing the location of Lee County, Virginia. (Image public domain/Wikipedia)" src="http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/lee-county-chancery/thumbs/thumbs_map_showing_lee_county_virginia.png" width="100" height="75" /></a>
		</div>
	</div>
	
		
 	 	
	<!-- Pagination -->
 	<div class='ngg-clear'></div>
 	
</div>


<p>The Lee County chancery causes are also not without their share of scandal. F. E. Parsons sued her late husband’s heirs seeking dower rights to land inherited by her husband in <em>F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee, etc.</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1897-006">1897-006</a>. The heirs claimed that F. E. Parsons, nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty-year-old father to gain ownership of his property. The widow accused her husband’s children of attempting to intimidate her by circulating “false and scandalous charges,” including accusing her of having an abortion before the marriage.  In the divorce suit <em>Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner</em>, <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=105-1894-082">1894-082</a>, Lilly Turner describes her husband as “living in open adultery for some time” and taking “pleasure in writing [her] about his filthy conduct.” Filed as an exhibit in the case is an 1893 letter Richard Turner sent to his wife describing the women he was having affairs with.</p>
<p>Lee County joins fifty-seven counties and cities whose chancery causes have been digitally reformatted and made available through the Library’s innovative <a href="http://www.lva.virginia.gov/agencies/CCRP/">Circuit Court Records Preservation Program</a>, which seeks to preserve the historic records of Virginia’s Circuit Courts. </p>
<p>-Bari Helms, Local Records Archivist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/2012/11/02/lee-co-chancery-goes-digital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
