Difference between revisions of ".MTUwMg.Mzg2MQ"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "April Court 1755 366")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
April Court 1755 366
 
April Court 1755 366
 +
At a Court continued and held for Stafford County 10th April 1755
 +
Present {Matt Donipham, John Peyton, John Washington, and Baily Washington} Gentlemen
 +
In the Action of Trespass Assault and Battery between John Addison Pet. and William Thomas deft. the deft. having pleaded not guilty the Pet. joined the Issue and the Trial thereof is referred till the next Court
 +
In the Action of Trespass upon the Case between Cain Withers Pet. and [Presly?] Cox def. the Replication in this Cause is joined and Trial thereof is referred till the next Court
 +
In the Action of debt between Robert Ashby who as well [illegible] Pet. and Henry Wiggington deft. the deft. having pleaded that he owes no things the Pet. joined the Issue and the Trial thereof is referred till the next Court
 +
In the Action of debt between Robert Ashby who as well for himself [illegible] Pet. and Abraham Bredwell deft. the deft. for Plea saith that he owes nothing, the Pet. joined the Issue and the Trial thereof is referred till the next Court
 +
In the Action of debt between Mary Wise Pet. and John Payton deft. the special Verdict in this cause being argued is adjudged for the deft. It's thereupon farther considered by the Court that the Pet take nothing by her Bill that the deft. go hence without day and that hereover of the Pet. his Costs by him about his defence in this behalf expended
 +
In the Action of Trespass upon the Case between Catherine Ashby by Robt. Ashby her next Friend Pet. and Samuel Bredwell deft. the special Verdict in this Case being argued is adjudged for the deft. it's thereupon further considered by the Court that the Pet. take nothing by her Bill that the deft. go hence without day and that he recover of the Pet. his Costs by him about his defence in this behalf expended
 +
In the Action of Trespass upon the Case between Sarah Mc. Cullough {McCullough?] by Joseph McCullough her next friends Pet. and Same. Bredwell deft. the Errors in this Cause being argued are adjudged good. It's thereup further considered by the Court that the Judgment given in this suit be reversed And that the Deft. recover of the said Pet. his Costs by him about his defense in this behalf expended
 +
In the Ejectione Firma between John Rout Pet. and for Lands and Appurtenances in the Parish of Overwharton in this Country as is set forth in the declaration John Waller by John Peyton Gent. is admitted deft. in the room

Revision as of 18:54, 25 January 2018

April Court 1755 366 At a Court continued and held for Stafford County 10th April 1755 Present {Matt Donipham, John Peyton, John Washington, and Baily Washington} Gentlemen In the Action of Trespass Assault and Battery between John Addison Pet. and William Thomas deft. the deft. having pleaded not guilty the Pet. joined the Issue and the Trial thereof is referred till the next Court In the Action of Trespass upon the Case between Cain Withers Pet. and [Presly?] Cox def. the Replication in this Cause is joined and Trial thereof is referred till the next Court In the Action of debt between Robert Ashby who as well [illegible] Pet. and Henry Wiggington deft. the deft. having pleaded that he owes no things the Pet. joined the Issue and the Trial thereof is referred till the next Court In the Action of debt between Robert Ashby who as well for himself [illegible] Pet. and Abraham Bredwell deft. the deft. for Plea saith that he owes nothing, the Pet. joined the Issue and the Trial thereof is referred till the next Court In the Action of debt between Mary Wise Pet. and John Payton deft. the special Verdict in this cause being argued is adjudged for the deft. It's thereupon farther considered by the Court that the Pet take nothing by her Bill that the deft. go hence without day and that hereover of the Pet. his Costs by him about his defence in this behalf expended In the Action of Trespass upon the Case between Catherine Ashby by Robt. Ashby her next Friend Pet. and Samuel Bredwell deft. the special Verdict in this Case being argued is adjudged for the deft. it's thereupon further considered by the Court that the Pet. take nothing by her Bill that the deft. go hence without day and that he recover of the Pet. his Costs by him about his defence in this behalf expended In the Action of Trespass upon the Case between Sarah Mc. Cullough {McCullough?] by Joseph McCullough her next friends Pet. and Same. Bredwell deft. the Errors in this Cause being argued are adjudged good. It's thereup further considered by the Court that the Judgment given in this suit be reversed And that the Deft. recover of the said Pet. his Costs by him about his defense in this behalf expended In the Ejectione Firma between John Rout Pet. and for Lands and Appurtenances in the Parish of Overwharton in this Country as is set forth in the declaration John Waller by John Peyton Gent. is admitted deft. in the room