Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
|Latest revision||Your text|
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
Brooks' exor plff vs Brooks admr deft and
Brooks' exor plff vs Brooks admr deft and plff vs Brooks' exor &c. defts
These causes came on this day to be further heard on the papers formerly read was argued by counsel and it appearing to this Court that the order for the sale of the negro
These causes came on this day to be further heard on the papers formerly read was argued by counsel and it appearing to this Court that the order for the sale of the negro heretoforemade in these causes has been injoined by an order of this Court entered in the suit of Lewis vs Tho. Brooks exor, May M Garland exer and others - therefore it is ordered that John Thompson Jr the former receiver in these causes continue to hire out the said Lewis and account for said hires as directed by former orders in these causes and that he show cause on the twelfth day of December next why he should not be attached for failing to pay over the hires formerly collected & directed to be paid according to the orders made in these suits