Difference between revisions of ".MTc4NTM.NzMxMjk"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
John Sherman being sworn and examined saith that in a suit brought by John Mercer against Nelson and an attachment served in the hands of one Spiller that the said Mercer advanced in court that the garnishee could not be allowed his discount because he had not attached in his own hands upon which one of the court asked Mr Mercer whether he affirmed that to be law which the said Mercer said he did and that it was law and the practice of other courts and another of the justices speaking to the said Mercer to the same purpose the said Mercer said wth: a smile you may hold your tongue for it is your own case in Stafford and he believes the discount was not allowed by the court and he believes the said Mercer did not design to affront the justices in saying he might hold his tongue and that he does not know of any unfair practice of the said Mercer in Prince William court other then what is contained in this deposision and that the said Mercer has had the oppertunity of being some suits against the deponent wch he did not bring out of favour to this deponent Mercer brought a suit in the said court on a bill found among the papers of Elias Horse said to be made by one Johnson payable to Whiteman that it appeared to the court that there was no such person as Whiteman but that Thomas Cabe the subscribeing swore he made the bill by Johnsons order and that upon the bill the court gave judgment and it was entered up for Whiteman with costs
 
John Sherman being sworn and examined saith that in a suit brought by John Mercer against Nelson and an attachment served in the hands of one Spiller that the said Mercer advanced in court that the garnishee could not be allowed his discount because he had not attached in his own hands upon which one of the court asked Mr Mercer whether he affirmed that to be law which the said Mercer said he did and that it was law and the practice of other courts and another of the justices speaking to the said Mercer to the same purpose the said Mercer said wth: a smile you may hold your tongue for it is your own case in Stafford and he believes the discount was not allowed by the court and he believes the said Mercer did not design to affront the justices in saying he might hold his tongue and that he does not know of any unfair practice of the said Mercer in Prince William court other then what is contained in this deposision and that the said Mercer has had the oppertunity of being some suits against the deponent wch he did not bring out of favour to this deponent Mercer brought a suit in the said court on a bill found among the papers of Elias Horse said to be made by one Johnson payable to Whiteman that it appeared to the court that there was no such person as Whiteman but that Thomas Cabe the subscribeing swore he made the bill by Johnsons order and that upon the bill the court gave judgment and it was entered up for Whiteman with costs
 +
and that a suit being brought against an acting executor the said Mercer prevailed on the court to have the suit dismiss because all the executors were not included and the said deponent saith that upon a petition brought in the name of Thomas Chapman against the executors of John Lewis and Leonard Barker obligatory to give Chapman an inspectors note for four hundred pounds of tobo. or there about by a certain time in the said note [satisfied?] Chapman not being able to come to court caused a letter to be wrote to the court to inform them that he knew nothing of

Revision as of 09:40, 19 March 2019

John Sherman being sworn and examined saith that in a suit brought by John Mercer against Nelson and an attachment served in the hands of one Spiller that the said Mercer advanced in court that the garnishee could not be allowed his discount because he had not attached in his own hands upon which one of the court asked Mr Mercer whether he affirmed that to be law which the said Mercer said he did and that it was law and the practice of other courts and another of the justices speaking to the said Mercer to the same purpose the said Mercer said wth: a smile you may hold your tongue for it is your own case in Stafford and he believes the discount was not allowed by the court and he believes the said Mercer did not design to affront the justices in saying he might hold his tongue and that he does not know of any unfair practice of the said Mercer in Prince William court other then what is contained in this deposision and that the said Mercer has had the oppertunity of being some suits against the deponent wch he did not bring out of favour to this deponent Mercer brought a suit in the said court on a bill found among the papers of Elias Horse said to be made by one Johnson payable to Whiteman that it appeared to the court that there was no such person as Whiteman but that Thomas Cabe the subscribeing swore he made the bill by Johnsons order and that upon the bill the court gave judgment and it was entered up for Whiteman with costs and that a suit being brought against an acting executor the said Mercer prevailed on the court to have the suit dismiss because all the executors were not included and the said deponent saith that upon a petition brought in the name of Thomas Chapman against the executors of John Lewis and Leonard Barker obligatory to give Chapman an inspectors note for four hundred pounds of tobo. or there about by a certain time in the said note [satisfied?] Chapman not being able to come to court caused a letter to be wrote to the court to inform them that he knew nothing of