Difference between revisions of ".MjExOTg.ODA0NTQ"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected ".MjExOTg.ODA0NTQ" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
the strong backing given by Supt. of Public Institution Dr. Alderman - Prof Thornton, Mr Craddock, representing Board of V., Mr Walton Moore, alumnus, the women - and lastly Bishop Denny. Then gave names of the opposing side, and in so doing I stated simply the names & institutions with which they are connected.  Student of U. Va Stokes of [Carrington?] (Montague influence, between "you, me & the gate post").  Cocke, Hollins Ins. Blckwell R M College, Ashland - Cannon, R M Ins, White, [illegible], McQuire opposing alumnus -  
+
the strong backing given by Supt. of Public Institution Dr. Alderman - Prof Thornton, Mr Craddock, representing Board of V., Mr Walton Moore, alumnus - the women - and - lastly Bishop Denny - Then gave names of the opposing side, and in so doing I stated simply the name & institutions with which they are connected.  Student of U. Va Stokes of Covington (Montague influence) between "you, me & the gate post").  Cocke, Hollins Ins. Blackwell R M College - Ashland - Cannon, R M. Ins - White, [Lexington?], McQuire opposing alumni -
I gave them in the order in which [they?] came in the debate closing with the reference to Bishop Denny - whose influence overbalanced the other Methodist it seemed to me, overwhelmingly.\I said I went to Richmond to satisfy myself that I was not working for something that would bring shame & disgrace to the State - and that I felt satisfied that those working for it, had the best interest of
+
I gave them in the order in which [illegible] came in the debate closing with the reference to Bishop Denny - whose influence overbalanced the other Methodists it seemed to me, overwhelmingly. I said I went to Richmond to satisfy myself that I was not working for something that would bring shame & disgrace to the State - and that I felt satisfied that those working for it, had the best interest of

Latest revision as of 09:08, 14 October 2019

the strong backing given by Supt. of Public Institution Dr. Alderman - Prof Thornton, Mr Craddock, representing Board of V., Mr Walton Moore, alumnus - the women - and - lastly Bishop Denny - Then gave names of the opposing side, and in so doing I stated simply the name & institutions with which they are connected. Student of U. Va Stokes of Covington (Montague influence) between "you, me & the gate post"). Cocke, Hollins Ins. Blackwell R M College - Ashland - Cannon, R M. Ins - White, [Lexington?], McQuire opposing alumni - I gave them in the order in which [illegible] came in the debate closing with the reference to Bishop Denny - whose influence overbalanced the other Methodists it seemed to me, overwhelmingly. I said I went to Richmond to satisfy myself that I was not working for something that would bring shame & disgrace to the State - and that I felt satisfied that those working for it, had the best interest of