Difference between revisions of ".MjkyMzE.MTA2Mjc3"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
by Nat Williams (meaning your orator) at $800 June 4th 1845 or words to that effect-the words are not remembered exactly but the said Bill & the Endorsement thereon will shew and your orator calls on the said Stevens to [exhibit?] the same. It is also evident from an instruction of the said endorsement that an effort has been made by some one to erase the said words by scratching them out but the effort was not successful and the endorsement is now plain. Your orator also states that in the face of the Bill of [illegible] the word 'redeemable' has been inserted in the hand-writing of said Stevens doubtedly at the same time the endorsement aforesaid was made. All of which facts go to sustain the allegations of the original Bill & your orator
+
by Nat Williams (meaning your orator) at $800 June 4th 1845 or words to that effect-the words are not remembered exactly but the said Bill & the Endorsement thereon will shew and your orator calls on the said Stevens to [exhibit?] the same. It is also evident from an instruction of the said endorsement that an effort has been made by some one to erase the said words by scratching them out but the effort was not successful and the endorsement is now plain. Your orator also states that in the face of the Bill of [illegible] the word 'redeemable' has been inserted in the hand-writing of said Stevens doubtedly at the same time the endorsement aforesaid was made. All of which facts go to sustain the allegations of the original Bill & your orator prays that the said [illegible] Stevens be made [illegible] to this & all the allegations hereof Bill and [illegible] the same as well as the original Bill on oath & that your HOnor would decree as prayed for in the original Bill & g't such other & further relief as to equity may deem meet etc. H.H. W. W. C. F. [illegible]

Revision as of 16:07, 19 February 2020

by Nat Williams (meaning your orator) at $800 June 4th 1845 or words to that effect-the words are not remembered exactly but the said Bill & the Endorsement thereon will shew and your orator calls on the said Stevens to [exhibit?] the same. It is also evident from an instruction of the said endorsement that an effort has been made by some one to erase the said words by scratching them out but the effort was not successful and the endorsement is now plain. Your orator also states that in the face of the Bill of [illegible] the word 'redeemable' has been inserted in the hand-writing of said Stevens doubtedly at the same time the endorsement aforesaid was made. All of which facts go to sustain the allegations of the original Bill & your orator prays that the said [illegible] Stevens be made [illegible] to this & all the allegations hereof Bill and [illegible] the same as well as the original Bill on oath & that your HOnor would decree as prayed for in the original Bill & g't such other & further relief as to equity may deem meet etc. H.H. W. W. C. F. [illegible]