But where the testater charges, as William Joes, his debts upon his whole estate, real and persenal, the persenal still remains the primary fund and the ordinary order of administration must be [illegible]. The whole personal property must be [extracted?], [illegible] bequests one and are before recourse can be had to the realty. [Lee?] Powell [in?] ‘ Derises 2nd old eddition pap 681, new edition 364. “ The next branch of our [illegible] inquiry is as to what will exempt the [presence?] estate [illegible] primary hability to debts and [illegible] charges, for which the testator has provided another fund inquestion which it will be seen has seen a [illegible] subject of litigation. That the making a provision for debts or [illegible] out of the real estate does not discharge the [personalty?] is implied in the [stay?] terms of this inquiry. There must be and intention not [illegible] to onerate the realty, but to exonerate the personalty; not mostly to supply another fund, but to substitute that fund for the property antecedently [illegible].