.MjkwNzU.MTAyNDI3

From Transcribe Wiki
Revision as of 12:31, 15 August 2020 by Mtursi (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

was awarded, his memory does not enable him now to say, nor can it be material. It it time your respondent applies for and obtained an appeal from the chancery decree [illegible], which constituted the alleged equity of the complainant's bill of injunction, and it is true he afterwards answered said bill, and your honor dissolved the injunction, not for want of more allegations, but because the only equity which had even existed in the decree [illegible], has be superseded by the appellate court; leaving no ground of equity in the bill. It is also true your respondent [illegible] out [illegible], after the [illegible] of said injunction, for the balance of his judgement at law [illegible]; the decree of the chancery court, as he is advised, became a [illegible] after the appeal, and upon that ground, and that only, [illegible] your honor have dissolved the injunction. Your respondent denies that he owes the complainant a [illegible], going out of the chancery suit [illegible], but on the contrary he insists that the complainant and is his [illegible], in the partnership transactions, which are the subject of that suit, and he will hopes to recover the sum reported in his favor, in the above [illegible] mentioned statement of the commissioner [illegible] your honor doubtless decreed as you thought just right, the court of