Difference between revisions of ".MjkxMzY.MTAzOTQ2"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The reading of this deposition is objected to | The reading of this deposition is objected to | ||
1 Because the deponent speaks of an arbitration to which Anderson McCormack was not a party and | 1 Because the deponent speaks of an arbitration to which Anderson McCormack was not a party and | ||
| − | 2d Because he speaks of a written agreement which is not produced. Geo. H Gilmer Counsel for | + | 2d Because he speaks of a written agreement which is not produced. Geo. H Gilmer Counsel for Deft Apl 1st 1839 |
3d Because said arbitration if any ever took place was after the Commencement of this suit. | 3d Because said arbitration if any ever took place was after the Commencement of this suit. | ||
| − | The | + | |
| + | The deposition is offered to prove Anderson McCormack's declarations | ||
Clerk of Franklin | Clerk of Franklin | ||
McCormack v McCormack } Depo of Daniel Ferguson | McCormack v McCormack } Depo of Daniel Ferguson | ||
Revision as of 21:52, 4 December 2020
In addition to the exceptions already endorsed in this depositions. The reading of it is objected to Because it does not appear to have been taken before justices of the peace for Franklin County in Franklin County. It does not appear in what Circuit it was taken or that the defendant had notice. JA Early for Defts.
The reading of this deposition is objected to 1 Because the deponent speaks of an arbitration to which Anderson McCormack was not a party and 2d Because he speaks of a written agreement which is not produced. Geo. H Gilmer Counsel for Deft Apl 1st 1839 3d Because said arbitration if any ever took place was after the Commencement of this suit.
The deposition is offered to prove Anderson McCormack's declarations Clerk of Franklin
McCormack v McCormack } Depo of Daniel Ferguson