Difference between revisions of ".MjkxMzY.MTAzOTQ2"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
The reading of this deposition is objected to  
 
The reading of this deposition is objected to  
 
1 Because the deponent speaks of an arbitration to which Anderson McCormack was not a party and  
 
1 Because the deponent speaks of an arbitration to which Anderson McCormack was not a party and  
2d Because he speaks of a written agreement which is not produced. Geo. H Gilmer Counsel for Defts Apl 1st 1837
+
2d Because he speaks of a written agreement which is not produced. Geo. H Gilmer Counsel for Deft Apl 1st 1839
 
3d Because said arbitration if any ever took place was after the Commencement of this suit.
 
3d Because said arbitration if any ever took place was after the Commencement of this suit.
The depositions offered to prove Anderson McCormack's declarations
+
 
 +
The deposition is offered to prove Anderson McCormack's declarations
 
Clerk of Franklin
 
Clerk of Franklin
  
 
McCormack v McCormack } Depo of Daniel Ferguson
 
McCormack v McCormack } Depo of Daniel Ferguson

Revision as of 21:52, 4 December 2020

In addition to the exceptions already endorsed in this depositions. The reading of it is objected to Because it does not appear to have been taken before justices of the peace for Franklin County in Franklin County. It does not appear in what Circuit it was taken or that the defendant had notice. JA Early for Defts.

The reading of this deposition is objected to 1 Because the deponent speaks of an arbitration to which Anderson McCormack was not a party and 2d Because he speaks of a written agreement which is not produced. Geo. H Gilmer Counsel for Deft Apl 1st 1839 3d Because said arbitration if any ever took place was after the Commencement of this suit.

The deposition is offered to prove Anderson McCormack's declarations Clerk of Franklin

McCormack v McCormack } Depo of Daniel Ferguson