Difference between revisions of ".MzIyODY.MTEwNzUy"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
PRESIDENT HOLDS PICKETS GUILTLESS  
 
PRESIDENT HOLDS PICKETS GUILTLESS  
  
IN his open letter to members of congress of both house, Mr. J. A. H. Hopkins - to whose call on the President in their behalf the imprisoned suffragist pickets owe their release - bares the attitude of mind borne by the Executive toward his uninvited
+
IN his open letter to members of congress of both house, Mr. J. A. H. Hopkins - to whose call on the President in their behalf the imprisoned suffragist pickets owe their release - bares the attitude of mind borne by the Executive toward his uninvited White House neighbors. According to Mr. Hopkins, the President stated that he had never, at any time, objected to the pickets nor had they annoyed him. To quote verbatim:
 +
 
 +
He accepted my statement and took it as his own, that the sixteen pickets had not violated any law nor any ordinance

Revision as of 11:26, 26 June 2020

SIX THE EVENING JOURNAL

Monday, August 13, 1917

Single copy 2c By carrier, weekly 10c

BY MAIL (COUNTRY) one year - $4.00 Six months - 2.00 One month - 0.40

Published every afternoon except Sunday by THE JOURNAL COMPANY at No. 400 East Broad Street, Richmond, Va.

S.T. CLOVER - President and Editor E.H. CHALKLEY - Secretary-Treasurer

Telephone - Randolph 6000

Foreign advertising representatives: N.M. Shef- Agency. Tribune Building, New York

VOTES, NOT JAIL SENTENCES

HAVING pardoned the silent sixteen suffragists for creating a disturbance - by standing quietly with the banners while an unruly mob leered at them - President Wilson has indicated his belief that they worse sinned against than sinning. However, to accept executive leniency would be awkward since, in that event, they would be under moral obligations to discontinue the picketing. Not wishing to forego what they believe to be an inalienable right, the martyrs to the cause at first were disinclined to accept the pardon, but reconsidered, evidently believing that a free suffragist can do more for the movement than one under lock and key. That is the only logical procedure. They have no become an issue, whereas their picketing practice was simply a matter of ethics. We altogether disagree with the toplofty attitude of the New York Times, which characterizes the conduct of the pickets as "unseemly and disgraceful demonstrations." Not a word of disapprobation for the cowardly mob that was the real offender against the law and whose leaders have earned the contempt of all red-blooded men. We deny that the pickets were obstructing the government now engaged in war. We might agree that they were embarrassing a negligent congress by their constant reminders of delayed justice, but the onus, clearly, is not on them. Why shouldn't the President be reminded of what the administration is neglecting? Other heads of nations are feeling the pinch applied by a persistent democracy. Kaiser Wilihelm is compelled to ponder his derelictions in regard to the restricted election franchise, and Lloyd George already had agreed to equal suffrage, which the British women have nobly earned. American women stand ready to respond just as freely, just as loyalty, just as unselfishly to the calls upon them, now that the United States is involved. Why wait until the war is over the accord what should be granted with spontaneity now? Considering it as a war measure, congress should have the Susan B. Anthony amendment to the Constitution reported out of committee forthwith, give it unanimous approval, and start it on its way to ratification by the various state legislatures. That will require three years to bring to a focus. In one hour congress can acquit itself of the measure. If it neglects to do so, it will remain an incubus on the national lawmaking body for months to come. Once before the two houses, it cannot fail of adoption. We hope the President will cut the Gordian knot by insisting on a vote.

vided for in the administration bills. Under the terms of the proposed act, soldiers, sailors and marines would be enabled to obtain insurance on their lives for the term of the war in sums from one thousand dollars to ten thousand dollars, the government taking the risk and the men paying the premiums. The rate would be, approximately, $S on $1,000 of insurance, and the premiums would be met by installments held out of ordinary commercial insurance, but the government can afford to cut rates, having no solicitors in the field. Cost to the government for two years is estimated at $556,650,000, or less than six per cent of the cost to the country of conducting the war. In its general features the bill has been approved by the advisory committee of insurance representatives called in conference by Secretary McAdoo last month. These experts, notes the secretary of the treasury, opposed the grant of any government insurance over and above the compensation, but favored, in addition, the payment by the government or $1,000 in each case of death in the discharge period or within five years after discharge of service, in lieu of insurance. All such insurance, of course, would be non-assignable and claims limited to wife, children and other specified near of kin. The measure will probably come up in the two branches of congress as soon as the war tax bill is out of the way.

PRESIDENT HOLDS PICKETS GUILTLESS

IN his open letter to members of congress of both house, Mr. J. A. H. Hopkins - to whose call on the President in their behalf the imprisoned suffragist pickets owe their release - bares the attitude of mind borne by the Executive toward his uninvited White House neighbors. According to Mr. Hopkins, the President stated that he had never, at any time, objected to the pickets nor had they annoyed him. To quote verbatim:

He accepted my statement and took it as his own, that the sixteen pickets had not violated any law nor any ordinance