Difference between revisions of ".MzM4MDE.MTEzNjcx"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | This | + | This Indenture made this [illegible] day of October [illegible] the year [from?] |
[illegible] Eighteen hundred and twenty five: [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] | [illegible] Eighteen hundred and twenty five: [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] | ||
of the town of [Alexandria?] and [District?] of Columbia of the | of the town of [Alexandria?] and [District?] of Columbia of the | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
said note, as [well?] as to [illegible] him said [illegible] | said note, as [well?] as to [illegible] him said [illegible] | ||
against any [illegible] [lofs?] | against any [illegible] [lofs?] | ||
− | Now this Indenture | + | Now this Indenture [illegible] that the |
+ | said [illegible] Thomas [illegible] [it?] [illegible] of the [illegible] | ||
+ | and of the [dam?] of [the?] dollar to her [illegible] had paid by the | ||
+ | [illegible] Thomas [illegible] [illegible] the [illegible] she [here's?[ | ||
+ | acknowledge has [illegible] [illegible] bargained and [illegible] | ||
+ | unto the said Thomas W [illegible], the following slaves | ||
+ | [illegible] David a mulatto about [Eighteen?] |
Revision as of 15:03, 28 October 2020
This Indenture made this [illegible] day of October [illegible] the year [from?] [illegible] Eighteen hundred and twenty five: [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] of the town of [Alexandria?] and [District?] of Columbia of the one part and Thomas [illegible] of the same town and District of the Other part Where [is?] the [illegible] [illegible] Thomas [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] unto Rech? [Mallack?] [illegible] hater of [illegible] [illegible] deceased, [illegible] the sum of Seven Hundred and fifty dollars: and Where's [illegible] said debt [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] her [illegible] given to a certain John [S?] [Runnilly?] for [the?] said sum of seven Hundred and fifty dollars, dated September the [14th?] 1825. and payable [illegible] monthy [illegible] [after?], which said note way [illegible] by the said John [S?] [Runnilly?] and by him dilivered to the said Richard [Mallack?], And [where's?] the said [illegible] Thomas is [illegible] of [illegible] the punctual payment of the said note, as [well?] as to [illegible] him said [illegible] against any [illegible] [lofs?] Now this Indenture [illegible] that the said [illegible] Thomas [illegible] [it?] [illegible] of the [illegible] and of the [dam?] of [the?] dollar to her [illegible] had paid by the [illegible] Thomas [illegible] [illegible] the [illegible] she [here's?[ acknowledge has [illegible] [illegible] bargained and [illegible] unto the said Thomas W [illegible], the following slaves [illegible] David a mulatto about [Eighteen?]