Difference between revisions of ".MzU0NTE.MTIzOTYx"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [left side of page] render any services, as well as my memories now serves. The negro continued at the shop about a week. I told Mr Isbell to take him away from the shop - he done so - carried Edmund to his house, where he continued until he died, without rendering any service | + | [left side of page] render any services, as well as my memories now serves. The negro continued at the shop about a week. I told Mr Isbell to take him away from the shop - he done so - carried Edmund to his house, where he continued until he died, without rendering any service. I did not consider Edmund of any value at all and believe from his appearance he died from [illegible] & old diseases and in truth the negro was nothing but an expense from the date of the purchase until his death. I am no phisian therefore cannot describe his disease minutely, but the fact is he could have died from any others but [illegible] complaints. |
| + | The Defendants by their Counsel excepts to so much of the above answer, as embraces the Statement of the negro Edmund made to the Witness, as [alleged?] and inadmissible. | ||
| + | Question by Defendants. | ||
Revision as of 16:31, 17 January 2022
[left side of page] render any services, as well as my memories now serves. The negro continued at the shop about a week. I told Mr Isbell to take him away from the shop - he done so - carried Edmund to his house, where he continued until he died, without rendering any service. I did not consider Edmund of any value at all and believe from his appearance he died from [illegible] & old diseases and in truth the negro was nothing but an expense from the date of the purchase until his death. I am no phisian therefore cannot describe his disease minutely, but the fact is he could have died from any others but [illegible] complaints. The Defendants by their Counsel excepts to so much of the above answer, as embraces the Statement of the negro Edmund made to the Witness, as [alleged?] and inadmissible. Question by Defendants.