Difference between revisions of ".MzU0NTE.MTIzOTc5"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " Isbell vs Peters")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
                                                                          Isbell vs Peters
+
                                                                                                      Isbell vs Peters
 +
Halsey as the agent of Peters sold a negro man slave [Bom] to Isbell on the 2 January 1833 for $300 payable 1 January 1834-  The slave was badly knock kneed. The sum agreed to be given considering this visible defect is conceded to be a fair [ & socend]  price-  Immediately after the sale Halsey [apigned] the note to Peters without recourse. After it fell  owe Peter commenced suit +prosecated it to a judgement and Isbell applied for and obtained an injunction, alledging in his bill - That he purchased the slave for a full + fair price- That he was induced to purchase by the false representation of [socendny] on the part of Halsey- That the slave was [iemocend] at the date of the purchase, laboring under a [lalerl] disease of which he shortly died-  That he was altogether [valueble] .  That this [unrocend] was known to Halsey and by him [gau] overtly concealed- That he acted as the concealed agent of Peters for the purpose of the letter purpetrating the fraud.

Revision as of 12:06, 20 January 2022

                                                                                                      Isbell vs Peters

Halsey as the agent of Peters sold a negro man slave [Bom] to Isbell on the 2 January 1833 for $300 payable 1 January 1834- The slave was badly knock kneed. The sum agreed to be given considering this visible defect is conceded to be a fair [ & socend] price- Immediately after the sale Halsey [apigned] the note to Peters without recourse. After it fell owe Peter commenced suit +prosecated it to a judgement and Isbell applied for and obtained an injunction, alledging in his bill - That he purchased the slave for a full + fair price- That he was induced to purchase by the false representation of [socendny] on the part of Halsey- That the slave was [iemocend] at the date of the purchase, laboring under a [lalerl] disease of which he shortly died- That he was altogether [valueble] . That this [unrocend] was known to Halsey and by him [gau] overtly concealed- That he acted as the concealed agent of Peters for the purpose of the letter purpetrating the fraud.