Difference between revisions of ".MzU5OTM.MTI2MTE5"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Hamsberger admrs et ads Phillips")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Hamsberger admrs et ads Phillips
+
Hamsberger admrs et al ads Phillips
 +
The separate answer of Jacob Hamsberger admr of Andrew Newman dec to a bill of complaint exhibited against him and another in the Circuit Superior Court of Law & Chancery on the Chancery side thereof by Henry Phillips
 +
This respondent saving and reserving to himself the benefit of all exceptions to said Bill for Answer thereto answers and says That it is true that suit was on the side of the court instituted in his name as admr of Andrew Newman dec for the use of Alexander Newman vs Henry Phillips for the sum of $300 upon these bonds executed by said Phillips to his intestate. And that he believed that said bonds were service for part of the purchase money for a negro man named Bill, then the property of Andrew Newman, sold by James Newman and Alexander Newman to said Henry Phillips

Revision as of 18:55, 5 January 2022

Hamsberger admrs et al ads Phillips The separate answer of Jacob Hamsberger admr of Andrew Newman dec to a bill of complaint exhibited against him and another in the Circuit Superior Court of Law & Chancery on the Chancery side thereof by Henry Phillips This respondent saving and reserving to himself the benefit of all exceptions to said Bill for Answer thereto answers and says That it is true that suit was on the side of the court instituted in his name as admr of Andrew Newman dec for the use of Alexander Newman vs Henry Phillips for the sum of $300 upon these bonds executed by said Phillips to his intestate. And that he believed that said bonds were service for part of the purchase money for a negro man named Bill, then the property of Andrew Newman, sold by James Newman and Alexander Newman to said Henry Phillips