Difference between revisions of ".MzUzMDI.MTIxMzEx"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Fluvanna County Sct. The answer of Daniel Norris to a bill filed against him in the County Court [illegible] by a certain Philip Carter.  Your Respondent saving & [illegible] all benefit of exception & a per answer to so much of sd. bill as he deems material to answer, says that it is true he hired to sd. [complat?] a Negroe as stated in sd. bill & at price stated as we'll put in by appear by reference to contract between the parties on which sd. contract judgment was recovered at common law.  Your respondent denied all other contract except that contained in the writing [illegible], & per answers to so much of complainants will as charges payments on act of sd contract says that all the money rec'd by respondent on act - [illegible] -  contract is intended as [illegible] on sd contract subject to the Judgment at Law - which credits your respondent believes amts to about $46 -
+
Fluvanna County Sct. The answer of Daniel Norris to a bill filed against him in the County Court issd by a certain Philip Carter.  Your Respondent saving & [illegible] all benefit of exception & a per answer to so much of sd. bill as he deems material to answer, says that it is true he hired to sd. [complat?] a Negroe as stated in sd. bill & at price stated as we'll put in by appear by reference to contract between the parties on which sd. contract judgment was recovered at common law.  Your respondent denied all other contract except that contained in the writing [illegible], & per answers to so much of complainants will as charges payments on act of sd contract says that all the money rec'd by respondent on act - [illegible] -  contract is intended as [illegible] on sd contract subject to the Judgment at Law - which credits your respondent believes amts to about $46 -

Revision as of 12:53, 30 March 2021

Fluvanna County Sct. The answer of Daniel Norris to a bill filed against him in the County Court issd by a certain Philip Carter. Your Respondent saving & [illegible] all benefit of exception & a per answer to so much of sd. bill as he deems material to answer, says that it is true he hired to sd. [complat?] a Negroe as stated in sd. bill & at price stated as we'll put in by appear by reference to contract between the parties on which sd. contract judgment was recovered at common law. Your respondent denied all other contract except that contained in the writing [illegible], & per answers to so much of complainants will as charges payments on act of sd contract says that all the money rec'd by respondent on act - [illegible] - contract is intended as [illegible] on sd contract subject to the Judgment at Law - which credits your respondent believes amts to about $46 -