Difference between revisions of ".MzUzOTY.MTIyODMy"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
to be relieved from their liability - your [respondents?] refer to this fact for the purpose of sustaining their portion that this is not good as an official bond, there being no such "agent" as that referred to in the bond + other proceedings in this case-  
+
to be relieved from their liability - your respondents refer to this fact for the purpose of sustaining their portion that this is not good as an official bond, there being no such "agent" as that referred to in the bond + other proceedings in this case-  
 
Your [respondents?] also insist that the supposed bond is not obligatory so far as they are concerned as a common law bond- The paper purports to be an official bond to the Court + not to the justices as individuals - If your [respondents?] bound themselves at all they did so as [sureties?] for an office of the Court , subject to all the requirements of the law in regard to the oath of office + other matters intended to ensure his fidelity + responsibility - Your [respondents?] contend therefore that the [has other?] of their obligation cannot be changed , so as to make them responsible for the acts of a private indiv-
 
Your [respondents?] also insist that the supposed bond is not obligatory so far as they are concerned as a common law bond- The paper purports to be an official bond to the Court + not to the justices as individuals - If your [respondents?] bound themselves at all they did so as [sureties?] for an office of the Court , subject to all the requirements of the law in regard to the oath of office + other matters intended to ensure his fidelity + responsibility - Your [respondents?] contend therefore that the [has other?] of their obligation cannot be changed , so as to make them responsible for the acts of a private indiv-
  

Revision as of 13:18, 30 March 2021

to be relieved from their liability - your respondents refer to this fact for the purpose of sustaining their portion that this is not good as an official bond, there being no such "agent" as that referred to in the bond + other proceedings in this case- Your [respondents?] also insist that the supposed bond is not obligatory so far as they are concerned as a common law bond- The paper purports to be an official bond to the Court + not to the justices as individuals - If your [respondents?] bound themselves at all they did so as [sureties?] for an office of the Court , subject to all the requirements of the law in regard to the oath of office + other matters intended to ensure his fidelity + responsibility - Your [respondents?] contend therefore that the [has other?] of their obligation cannot be changed , so as to make them responsible for the acts of a private indiv-

idual to other private individuals- To do so would be to change the whole [illegible] and [effect?] of their obligation + to bind them for one thing, where it is plain from the face of the papers, that they intended to bind themselves for another + wholly different thing- Your [respondents?] therefore pray that so far as they are concerned the bill of the complainants may be dismissed + that they may recover their costs against the complainants + are is duty bound they will ever pray +c

[Mr?] H H Stuart for Defts

Corporation of [Stauntin?] Sc That day D S Young one of the parties to the above answer made oath before me Mayor of Corporation aforesaid that he believes the statement [of fact?] therein containted to be true - Given under my hand this 13th [May?] 1854

[Mhunt?] Mayor