Difference between revisions of ".MzYwMTg.MTI2NjY2"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
10th Did he or did he not have all his work done in the blacksmiths shop during the time you lived with the sd Masons.
 
10th Did he or did he not have all his work done in the blacksmiths shop during the time you lived with the sd Masons.
 
Answer. He did I have frequently had work done there for said Mason while I lived with him.
 
Answer. He did I have frequently had work done there for said Mason while I lived with him.
11th Did he or did he not deal chiefly in the store of [illegible] Walston & Son.
+
11th Did he or did he not deal chiefly in the store of sd Walston & Son.
 
Answer. He did. he brought more goods there than any where also he bot goods sometimes of [Ailworth?]
 
Answer. He did. he brought more goods there than any where also he bot goods sometimes of [Ailworth?]
12th [illegible] your knowledge of the dealings of the [illegible] Mason in the store of [illegible] Walston & Son, is or is not the [illegible] [illegible] before you filed in the papers of this suit [illegible] [illegible].
+
12th From your knowledge of the dealings of the sd Mason in the store of sd Walston & Son, is or is not the [illegible] now before you (filed in the papers of this suit) [illegible].
 
Answer. I do not know.
 
Answer. I do not know.
13th Is or is not that part of the [illegible] account [illegible] in 1839 [illegible]
+
13th Is or is not that part of the sd account commencing in 1829 [illegible]
 
Answer. I do not think it [illegible]
 
Answer. I do not think it [illegible]
 
14th Was, or was not the [illegible] Mason in the habit of having his work done in the blacksmiths shop of the [illegible] Walston before you went there to live.
 
14th Was, or was not the [illegible] Mason in the habit of having his work done in the blacksmiths shop of the [illegible] Walston before you went there to live.

Revision as of 17:08, 30 January 2022

smith's shop of Samuel Walston. Answer. He was in the habit of a dealing in the store, of sd [said] Walston & Son and having work done in the blacksmith shop of Walston. 9th Did he or did he not have an account in the sd store and also in the sd Blacksmiths shop or was he in the habit of being charged in the said store for goods brought & in the shop for work done. Answer. Sometimes he paid for the things he brought in the store & at other times he was charged he was generally charged for work done in the blacksmith shop. 10th Did he or did he not have all his work done in the blacksmiths shop during the time you lived with the sd Masons. Answer. He did I have frequently had work done there for said Mason while I lived with him. 11th Did he or did he not deal chiefly in the store of sd Walston & Son. Answer. He did. he brought more goods there than any where also he bot goods sometimes of [Ailworth?] 12th From your knowledge of the dealings of the sd Mason in the store of sd Walston & Son, is or is not the [illegible] now before you (filed in the papers of this suit) [illegible]. Answer. I do not know. 13th Is or is not that part of the sd account commencing in 1829 [illegible] Answer. I do not think it [illegible] 14th Was, or was not the [illegible] Mason in the habit of having his work done in the blacksmiths shop of the [illegible] Walston before you went there to live. Answer. I do not know. 15th Was or was not the said Mason in the habit of dealing in the store of [illegible] Ailworth [illegible] and did you not frequently purchased goods out of the said store for the [illegible] Mason. Answer. He was in the habit of dealing in the [illegible] store and I frequently bot goods there for the [illegible] Mason. 16th Did you, or [illegible] you not at all interested in the claims to which you have testified above. Ans. Not at all.