Difference between revisions of ".MzYwMTg.MTI2Njc5"

From Transcribe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
[proved?] by the witnesses. They [do not?]
 
[proved?] by the witnesses. They [do not?]
 
specify the [hire?]. As to the [paper?] B
 
specify the [hire?]. As to the [paper?] B
it is, if [an?] acknowledgment at all,
+
it is, if [an?] acknowledgment at all,  
 +
more than 5 years before the
 +
[illegible] of the suit.
 +
The [Report?] must be [recommitted?]
 +
with directions to strike out all
 +
the a/cs [accounts] of more than 5 years [standing?]
 +
The heirs

Revision as of 15:40, 4 May 2022

Seymour vs Mason The act of [illegible] is well pleaded. The suit was brought in 1839, Feby 5th. & all the accounts are [illegible] these 5 years [illegible] that time. The paper marked B. is not [such an?] [illegible] [illegible] as takes the case out of the [illegible] [illegible] is [illegible] ][such?] acknowledgment [proved?] by the witnesses. They [do not?] specify the [hire?]. As to the [paper?] B it is, if [an?] acknowledgment at all, more than 5 years before the [illegible] of the suit. The [Report?] must be [recommitted?] with directions to strike out all the a/cs [accounts] of more than 5 years [standing?] The heirs