Difference between revisions of ".MzYxMDY.MTI4NjI4"
m (Protected ".MzYxMDY.MTI4NjI4" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
Latest revision as of 10:19, 3 August 2021
The Answer in Chancery of the City of Winchester to the Bill in Chancery brought against it and others in the Corporation Court of the City of Winchester. This defendant demurs to said bill for want of jurisdiction and for want of equity on its face, and for answer to said bill says that the only part of the land in the bill referred to over which respondent through any of tis authorized agents has ever attempted to exercise any control is that embraced in the deed of 9 March 1810 from James M Marsh to respondents. And to this Complainants made no complaint in their bill, as to the allegation of the bill that this lot is now full and no further interments can be made in it, respondent will take of that It may be a question important to be settled in this cause how ifar Complainants are accountable to respondents for the moneys received by them for internments made in this "Marshall lot". Respondents have never asserted and now disclaim any sort of control or right to control the other land in said bill mentioned. And having answered and denying all fraud & it prays to be dismissed with its costs. City of Winchester by counsel